Days before a meeting between Brazil, Russia, India, and China in New Delhi, a Tibetan man set himself on fire near India’s parliament during a protest against Chinese rule in Tibet. He died shortly after, but the main concern Chinese officials had was not the strength of his protest about Tibet but to avoid embarrassment on behalf of President Hu Jintao during his visit to India. Incidents of this type are not uncommon in Tibetan protests with a similar example in New Delhi in 1998 and more than 30 other cases of self-immolation recently.
China does not seem to worried by Tibetan protests because many Western countries are more focused on securing Chinese help for other international and economic issues than focusing on the internal problems with Tibet. Avoiding confronting China in favor of cooperation means that Tibetan protests are not given much attention. China has been forced to be non-committal about other problems as a result of its issues with Tibet for fear that taking a stand in support of intervening in another country like Syria will lead to support for anti-government protests in China.
Tibetan protests have caused the government of China to become more strict and increase security. All Tibetans involved in the protest or practicing self-immolation are being called terrorists. Media is portraying the Dalai Lama as fascist who wishes to remove other ethnic groups from Tibet. It seems that protests will continue despite the fact that their purpose and effectiveness is very limited.
http://www.economist.com/node/21551540